The Core Net Vitals Know-how Report by the open supply HTTPArchive neighborhood ranks content material administration techniques by how effectively they carry out on Google’s Core Net Vitals (CWV). The November 2025 knowledge reveals a major hole between platforms with the highest ranked CMS scoring 84.87% of web sites passing CWV, whereas the lowest ranked CMS scored 46.28%.
What’s of curiosity this month is that the high three Core Net Vitals champs are all closed supply proprietary platforms whereas the open supply techniques have been at the backside of the pack.
Significance Of Core Net Vitals
Core Net Vitals (CWV) are metrics created by Google to measure how briskly, steady, and responsive an internet site feels to customers. Web sites that load rapidly and reply easily maintain guests engaged and have a tendency to carry out higher by way of gross sales, reads, and add impressions, whereas websites that fall quick frustrate customers, enhance bounce charges, and carry out much less effectively for enterprise targets. CWV scores replicate the high quality of the person expertise and the way a web site performs beneath real-world circumstances.
How the Knowledge Is Collected
The CWV Know-how Report combines two public datasets.
The Chrome UX Report (CrUX) makes use of knowledge from Chrome customers who choose in to share efficiency statistics as they browse. This displays how actual customers expertise web sites.
The HTTP Archive runs lab-based exams that analyze how websites are constructed and whether or not they observe efficiency finest practices.
Collectively, the report I generated offers a snapshot of how every content material administration system performs on Core Net Vitals.
Rating By November 2025 CWV Rating
Duda Is The Quantity One Ranked Core Net Vitals Champ
Duda ranked first in November 2025, with 84.87% of web sites constructed on the platform delivering a passing Core Net Vitals rating. It was the solely platform on this comparability the place greater than 4 out of 5 websites achieved CWV rating. Duda has constantly ranked #1 for Core Net Vitals for a number of years now.
Wix Ranked #2
Wix ranked second, with 74.86% of web sites passing CWV. Whereas it trailed Duda by ten proportion factors, Wix was nearly 4 proportion factors forward of the third place CMS on this comparability.
Squarespace Ranked #3
Squarespace ranked third, at 70.39%. Its CWV cross charge positioned it nearer to Wix than to Drupal, sustaining a transparent place in the high three ranked publishing platforms.
Drupal Ranked #4
Drupal ranked fourth, with 63.27% of web sites passing CWV. That rating put Drupal in the center of the comparability, under the three non-public label web site builders. This is a curious scenario as a result of the backside three CMS’s on this comparability are all open supply platforms.
Joomla Ranked #5
Joomla ranked fifth, at 56.92%. Whereas greater than half of Joomla websites handed CWV, the platform remained effectively behind the high performers.
WordPress Ranked Final at place #6
WordPress ranked final, with 46.28% of web sites passing Core Net Vitals. Fewer than half of WordPress websites met the CWV thresholds on this snapshot. What’s notable about WordPress’s poor rating is that it lags behind the fifth place Joomla by about ten proportion factors. So not solely is WordPress ranked final on this comparability, it’s decisively final.
Why the Numbers Matter
Core Net Vitals scores translate into measurable variations in how customers expertise web sites. Platforms at the high of the rating ship sooner and extra steady experiences throughout a bigger share of web sites, whereas platforms at the backside expose a higher variety of customers to slower and fewer responsive pages. The hole between Duda and WordPress in the November 2025 comparability was almost 40 proportion factors, 38.59 proportion factors.
Whereas an argument could be made that the WordPress ecosystem of plugins and themes could also be to blame for the low CWV scores, the reality stays that WordPress is lifeless final on this comparability. Maybe WordPress wants to turn out to be extra proactive about how themes and plugins carry out, corresponding to provide you with requirements that they’ve to meet so as to achieve a efficiency certification. That may trigger plugin and theme makers to prioritize efficiency.
Do Content material Administration Methods Matter For Rating?
I’ve talked about this before and can repeat it this month. There have been discussions and debates about whether or not the selection of content material administration system impacts search rankings. Some argue that plugins and suppleness make WordPress simpler to rank in Google. However the reality is that non-public platforms like Duda, Wix, and Squarespace have all targeted on offering aggressive search engine marketing functionalities that automate a variety of technical search engine marketing duties.
Some individuals insist that Core Net Vitals make a major contribution to their rankings and I imagine them. However basically, the reality is that CWV efficiency is a minor rating issue.
However, efficiency nonetheless issues for outcomes that are rapid and measurable, corresponding to person expertise and conversions, which signifies that the November 2025 HTTPArchive Know-how Report ought to not be ignored.
The HTTPArchive report is out there here however it will likely be going away and changed very quickly. I’ve tried the new report and, except I missed one thing, it lacks a approach to constrain the report by date.
Featured Picture by Shutterstock/Crimson Fox studio
Disclaimer: This article is sourced from external platforms. OverBeta has not independently verified the information. Readers are advised to verify details before relying on them.
