After months of conversations with ChatGPT, a 53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur turned satisfied he’d found a treatment for sleep apnea and that highly effective folks had been coming after him, in accordance to a brand new lawsuit filed in California Superior Court docket in San Francisco County. He then allegedly used the software to stalk and harass his ex-girlfriend.
Now the ex-girlfriend is suing OpenAI, alleging the firm’s expertise enabled the acceleration of her harassment, TechCrunch has completely realized. She claims OpenAI ignored three separate warnings that the consumer posed a risk to others, together with an inner flag classifying his account exercise as involving mass-casualty weapons.
The plaintiff, referred to as Jane Doe to defend her id, is suing for punitive damages. She additionally filed a short lived restraining order Friday asking the courtroom to drive OpenAI to block the consumer’s account, stop him from creating new ones, notify her if he makes an attempt to entry ChatGPT, and protect his full chat logs for discovery.
OpenAI has agreed to droop the consumer’s account however has refused the relaxation, in accordance to Doe’s legal professionals. They are saying the firm is withholding information about particular plans for harming Doe and different potential victims the consumer could have mentioned with ChatGPT.
The lawsuit lands amid rising concern over the real-world dangers of sycophantic AI programs. GPT-4o, the mannequin cited on this and lots of different circumstances, was retired from ChatGPT in February.
The case is introduced by Edelson PC, the agency behind the wrongful dying fits involving teenager Adam Raine, who died by suicide after months of conversations with ChatGPT, and Jonathan Gavalas, whose household alleges Google’s Gemini fueled his delusions and potential mass-casualty occasion before his dying. Lead legal professional Jay Edelson has warned that AI-induced psychosis is escalating from individual harm toward mass-casualty events.
That authorized strain is now colliding immediately with OpenAI’s legislative technique: The corporate is backing an Illinois bill that will defend AI labs from legal responsibility even in circumstances involving mass deaths or catastrophic monetary hurt.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
OpenAI did not reply in time to remark. TechCrunch will replace the article if the firm responds.
The Jane Doe lawsuit lays out intimately how that legal responsibility performed out for one lady over a number of months.
Final 12 months, the ChatGPT consumer in the lawsuit (whose title is not included in the lawsuit to defend his id) turned satisfied that he had invented a treatment for sleep apnea after months of “excessive quantity, sustained use of GPT-4o.” When nobody took his work critically, ChatGPT instructed him that “highly effective forces” had been watching him, together with utilizing helicopters to surveil his actions, in accordance to the grievance.
In July 2025, Jane Doe urged him to cease utilizing ChatGPT and to search assist from a psychological well being skilled. He as a substitute turned again to ChatGPT, which assured him he was “a degree 10 in sanity” and helped him double down on his delusions, per the lawsuit.
Doe had damaged up with the consumer in 2024, and he used ChatGPT to course of the cut up, in accordance to emails and communications cited in the lawsuit. Quite than push again on his one-sided account, it repeatedly forged him as rational and wronged, and her as manipulative and unstable. He then took these AI-generated conclusions off the display screen and into the actual world, utilizing them to stalk and harass her. This manifested in a number of AI-generated, clinical-looking psychological reviews that he distributed to her household, mates, and employer.
In the meantime, the consumer continued to spiral. In August 2025, OpenAI’s automated security system flagged him for “Mass Casualty Weapons” exercise and deactivated his account.
A human security staff member reviewed the account the subsequent day and restored it, although his account could have contained proof that he was concentrating on and stalking people, together with Doe, in actual life. For instance, a September screenshot the consumer despatched to Doe confirmed an inventory of dialog titles together with “violence listing growth” and “fetal suffocation calculation.”
The choice to reinstate is notable following two current college shootings in Tumbler Ridge, Canada, and at Florida State College (FSU). OpenAI’s security staff had flagged the Tumbler Ridge shooter as a possible risk, however higher-ups reportedly determined not to alert authorities. Florida’s legal professional common this week opened an investigation into OpenAI’s potential hyperlink with the FSU shooter.
In accordance to the Jane Doe lawsuit, when OpenAI restored her stalker’s account, his Professional subscription wasn’t reinstated alongside it. He emailed the belief and security staff to type it out, copying Doe on the message.
In his emails, he wrote issues like: “I NEED HELP VERY FAST, PLEASE. PLEASE CALL ME!” and “this is a matter of life or dying.” He claimed he was “in the strategy of writing 215 scientific papers,” which he was writing so quick he didn’t “even have time to learn.” Included in these emails was an inventory of tens of AI-generated “scientific papers” with titles like: “Deconstructing Race as a Organic Category_ Authorized, Scientific, and Horn of Africa Views.pdf.txt.”
“The consumer’s communications offered unmistakable discover that he was mentally unstable and that ChatGPT was the engine of his delusional considering and escalating conduct,” the lawsuit states. “The consumer’s stream of pressing, disorganized, and grandiose claims, together with a concrete ChatGPT-generated report concentrating on Plaintiff by title and a sprawling physique of purported ‘scientific’ supplies, was unmistakable proof of that actuality. OpenAI did not intervene, limit his entry, or implement any safeguards. As a substitute, it enabled him to proceed utilizing the account and restored his full Professional entry.”
Doe, who claims in the lawsuit that she was dwelling in worry and will not sleep in her own residence, submitted a Discover of Abuse to OpenAI in November.
“For the final seven months, he has weaponized this expertise to create public destruction and humiliation in opposition to me that will have been inconceivable in any other case,” Doe wrote in her letter to OpenAI requesting the firm completely ban the consumer’s account.
OpenAI responded, acknowledging the report was “extraordinarily critical and troubling” and that it was rigorously reviewing the information. Doe by no means heard again.
Over the subsequent couple of months, the consumer continued to harass Doe, sending her a sequence of threatening voicemails. In January, he was arrested and charged with 4 felony counts of speaking bomb threats and assault with a lethal weapon. Doe’s legal professionals allege this validates warnings each she and OpenAI’s personal security programs had raised months earlier, warnings the firm allegedly selected to ignore.
The consumer was discovered incompetent to stand trial and dedicated to a psychological well being facility, however a “procedural failure by the State” means he’ll quickly be launched to the public, in accordance to Doe’s legal professionals.
Edelson known as on OpenAI to cooperate. “In each case, OpenAI has chosen to conceal crucial security information — from the public, from victims, from folks its product is actively placing at risk,” he stated. “We’re calling on them, for as soon as, to do the proper factor. Human lives should imply greater than OpenAI’s race to an IPO.”
Disclaimer: This article is sourced from external platforms. OverBeta has not independently verified the information. Readers are advised to verify details before relying on them.
